Who is it that ties your hands when influences and actions take place seemingly outside of your control, and in direct opposition to the
principles and strategy of the organisation.
I am sure you have all observed or even participated in organisations where the
behaviour of the leadership and observations by some were that their hands were
tied.
Is that really true though? Ever?
A quote by Edmund Burke "The only thing necessary for evil to prosper is
when good men do nothing" came to mind when looking at some executive reactions to events that impact their organisational or personal position.
Whilst we might try and shift our responsibility to impacts outside our control
there is still the question of how you respond to these events, and how you
portray your true values and beliefs. If you do not demonstrate and reinforce
your values and openly communicate your position to your people then how do you
expect them to either respect or uphold any support for what is trying to be
achieved.
If your hands are tied then the message is that you are not the leader but the
slave Someone else, not you, then is leading your people. For you to remain silent is
to condone or support the direction of others.
So what is your voice in the case of events outside your control? Spit the dummy? Become resistant or even militant? No. There is a voice that
can be heard, substantiated by reason, evidence and belief. Its a voice that
can have an open conversation and lay the path for a way forward that
recognises the drivers and where honest discussion can be made.
A conversation
based on principles that drive a clear strategy for the way forward and declares
a foundation for everyone to know where things stand, particularly your own
people.
Even if you suggest a prudent silent response is best, do your people and any
other onlooker for that matter really know your true position? Is your silence
understood? In a world that likes things to be nice and a sense of keeping the peace is preferred it is very easy to think that doing anything but staying quiet is simply causing trouble. This however provides the greatest opportunity for those that have more sinister agendas to unravel both you and your organisation.
Every time you remain silent you lose a bit of your integrity, and it sets a precedent upon which arguments for the next occasion, and the next, are built. Not just by you, but also by others. You have now given permission for others to lead and to further undermine you and your organisation. What you were trying to avoid has now become the Inevitable.
The reason why we succumb is often a lie, a lie that we built ourselves. Those that want to seek their own agenda also know this, and only need to test the ground to prove it and induce a reaction (or not) as the case may be. Your fear is usually "self generated"
even if you don’t want to admit it. If you remain silent then their point is proven.
Putting your position on the line or
presenting politically unpopular messaging is what real leaders do.
You might say that you always stand on and uphold your principles, however
assure me this. When it’s your job on the line or when the popular belief is
against you, when you feel your hands are tied, will you speak?
Decide what your response will
be.
Have you already given the ownership away?
Does everyone know your true position, or are you silent?
Are you just a good person doing nothing?
Its not too late.
No comments:
Post a Comment